Secularism = Appeasement?

Yeah, the same controversial topic once again. To make things clear, no, I'm not playing the devil's advocate here. A note of caution--this post is going to be very blunt and unrelenting, so shoo!! if you can only shout and are incapable of listening and comprehending. And..I AM gonna use the terms which many shudder to think of. Anyway, before going any further...here's a teeny tiny news ticker from the plethora of information that I COULD have posted here.

4-5th Oct Weekend, 2008

NDFB kills 32 people and injures more than 100 Hindus and Muslims in Udalgiri. They termed it ethnic cleansing.--NDFB is a Christian outfit with leader Ranjan Daimary operating out of Bangladesh.
Oct 5: 4 NDFB members arrested for burning a child and woman alive.



Let's flash back to 2001..oh that fateful September 11...and the world would never be the same again. Since then the Americans have been leading the charge of a world coalition against terrorism. Umm..do they, or even many of us know that the Baptist Church in southern parts of Amercia actually sponsors the arsenal needed for Christian terrorism in North East India? No, I suppose. Heck, T.N Seshan has been saying this since 1993!!...but who cares? No, it's not that who cares....we are actually scared. After all , we are a secular country, with secular people..right? How can we speak of a terrorism perpetrated by minorities? So what if money from the ISI, The Gulf States, The Baptist Church of southern US and The Presbyterian Church of UK provides automatic rifles and landmines to the terrorists? We are secular and we won't say anything.



The NLFT(National Liberation Front of Tripura) is a predominantly Baptist(Protestant) organisation and its employment of terror tactics for mass conversion is proven and well documented. Most of their rebel camps operate in Bangladesh. In 1999, four members of the RSS were kidnapped by the NLFT and taken to Bangladesh demanding a ransom of 2 crores was demanded from the RSS. The RSS refused, and the four were massacred. What was their crime? They were working among the tribals and teaching the values and preservation of Hindu faith. Did it create any media sensation? Do any of you even know about it? I doubt, after all, we are so secular aren't we.



The attacks on Hindu preachers and spiritual leaders isn't anything new. It actually dates back to as early as 1980s in the Khasi hills where the Presbyterian(Protestant) Church is dominant. Do any of us remember a name Reverend John Thwaites? A Protestant preist who had been living in Bengal for over 30 years. There was clear evidence of his involvement with the Kamtapuri separatist terrorism. Our 'secular' Government quietly asked him to leave the country. When he didn't leave, he was arrested and prosecuted--all the christian junta and his sympathisers held demostrations. What happened? Well...a 3 month imprisonment and then he was deported back to the UK. How sweet, see!, this is what I'm talking about. We're secular people, we wouldn't want to humiliate and punish a spiritual leader of a minority community now would we.



Oh it doesn't stop here, the Baptist terrorists also killed a Catholic priest Father Victor Crasta in 2000. But that's not sectarian right? We know these things only happen in Hinduism, and we also know that we are very secular. Christian terrorists all over the north east, esp in Assam and Tripura have banned everything they see as Hindu festivals. Durga Puja, Saraswati Puja, Diwali, any damn thing you can think of has been banned. When the tribals perform any Hindu festival or ritual, they are attacked and killed without mercy. The NLFT loudly proclaims that they want to expand Tripura as the Kingdom of God and Christ. Hmmm...interestting.

Let alone acting as the mediators or financiers, priests of the Baptist Church have actually been arrested for possession of explosives and supplying arms to the terrorists. Nagmanlal Halam of the Noapara Baptists Church was arrested for possession of explosives. 3 other members of the same church were also arrested for terrorist links and one of them Jatna Koloi actually confessed that he received guerilla warfare!! training from thr NLFT. Whenever the RSS workers tried to help the Hindus under attack, they were kidnapped for ransom or killed. Shanti kali Maharaj, Lavkumar jamatiya and several other Hindu sages and spiritiual activists have been murdered. Hindu and Buddhist temples have been burned. It goes on and the media stays shut up...we stay shut up. Even so much as a rumor of an attack on a Christian makes headlines...Italy shouts, EU shouts, US shouts, Vatican shouts, we shout with them...'minorities under attack!!' we say, but not a word on the extremest of extremism happening elsewhere in India. Ever heard anybody shouting in or outside India when Hindus are massacred in Malaysia & Indonesia? No, and understandably so, we are very secular after all.

NSCN in Nagaland wants it's very own Christian nation. There is evidence of involvement with ISI too. Meghalaya is no better, in fact the Church very boldly issues threats to anybody having any links to Hindu organisations. Oh, and it doesn't stop here..they also indulge in smuggling and making fake currency. Bedang Tamjin, a Christian missionary was arrested for making fake currency notes in 1998.

Assam-- well, we all know what happens in Assam don't we, or do we? Death count of Hindus aside (I don't believe in coming up with imaginary figures, but trust me it's HUGE), you should know that they will kill anyone who merely speaks Hindi....interesting no? They have already declared they are not Indians. Indian-ness is actually so foreign to them that they even banned sarees!! But I'm not complaining...this is not fanaticism or anti national at all..hell no. Anti national can only be used for activities carried out by the majority religion. Yes, I know it, I'm very secular...I know it.

I am very secular so I have a one eyed vew of what the misionaries are doing in India. Yes, burning of houses of worship, muders and rapes are not justified..needless to say that all people involved in such crimes deserve capital punishment, but do I look at the broader perspective before going all gung-ho about the "intolerance" of Hindus? No, I don't, I'm a secular person you see. Many Christian spiritual leaders, Muslims leaders have been shouting and hurling abuses at other faiths for quite sometime--the number of instances are so many that I can't even list .01% of them here so I'll just leave you with this recent example. Every once in a while someone comes along and talks about a worldwide Islamic Caliphate or the Evangelism of entire Asia, etc. But hey, what do you know, fanaticism is exclusive to Indian Hindus. You may want to read this article by C. Alex Alexander, published in 2003. There are numerous evidences, very well documented throughout the History of Christianity in India--here's another one of what missionaries do. After the tsunami, the US National Council of Churches issued a statement warning against the practice by "New Missionaries" of mixing evangelism and aid. "Often lacking sophistication about the lure of gifts and money, and wanting to be generous with their resources, they easily fall prey to the charge of using unethical means to evangelize. This creates a backlash," the February statement read. Bob Alter, a former Presbyterian pastor from Mussoorie says "You get this guy out of Texas who has no idea of the local culture, he is out to win souls, and he comes with a lot of money. You have Baptists using the Diwali festival , but they come to 'spread the light to those in darkness.' That is mighty offensive stuff, when you're out to tear down another religion." I could go on and on about what happens in Bihar, Karnataka, Chattisgarh or how Hindu deities are demeaned and even abusively compared with Jesus Christ in Satyadarshini, printed and published by Karunmaya press of the Carmel Church in Hyderabad...but!..I won't. It's all ok you see, and we are all so secular.

Mind you, this is not to say that most of them do this, there are many missonaries who are involved in genuine social work, bulding up good schools and hospitals etc etc. But these things exist too--you can't just brush aside all these facts and lump everything on Hindu extremism. Yes, you can't..but I don't believe that..coz I'm a secular Indian. It should serve as a wake up call to all of those who believe in all the crap thrust upon them by the media, the politicians and some pseudo-secular intellectuals. Go ahead, research a bit more, read and then read some more, maybe you'll understand something...sadly, I couldn't as I'm a very secular person. I also know that all previous stories of nuns being raped by Hindu fundamentalists in the past (on 3 occasions) have been found false or completely made up. The recent Kandhamal case might very well be true, and if it is, it is shameful and disgusting and I feel sad and enraged, just as every human being would feel at such acts of hatred. As of now, it's not been proved. The nun is still playing a hide and seek game, not willing to ID anyone, not willing to cooperate with the police. It was gang rape, then it became rape by one while two others held and molested her, and very recently she has said that one man raped her and then a Hindu man actually saved her from the gang rape. These are the facts as of now, but I have already decided that Hinduism is intolerant and supports rape and murders of innocents. I know you can't do zilch about mob mentality in these conditions, be it Hindus, Christians or Muslims...but even then I've made up my mind that Hindus are gonna set India afire. Yes, I know it...I'm a secular person.

We are so secular as a country that we still feel jittery about using the term Islamic terrorism. The world accepts it, but we cannot, of course not...we are secular unlike the rest of the world. "Terrorists have no religion" they (you know who you are) say, except anti social Hindu extremists who have ever only reacted. I know they are Hindu terrorists, and Hindu terrorism will eat India alive....Islamic Terrorism...what's that? I don't know, I'm a secular Indian you see.

Gujarat riots always come up in such a debate, and without blnking an eye we skip the Sabarmati express incident evertyime. That this was the trigger for the riots which followed is uncool to admit. That 58 Hindu men, women and children were burnt alive in a pre-planned operation(proven by all commissions) by a mob of 500 strong armed Muslim extremists doesn't deserve any attention. Yes, it doesn't...and rightly so...we are a secular nation after all. 790 Muslims dead and 254 hindus dead; Hindus outnumber Muslims by more than 6:1 in this country and 8:1 in Gujarat--do you see the attempted genocide here? I do, why not, I'm a secular Indian. 400,000 Kashmiri Pandits, comprising 99% of the total Hindu population of the valley were pushed out by even as early as 1989!, more than 2000 tortured and killed by Muslim terrorists. Burned alive, branded with hot irons, their vital organs gouged out, bodies dismembered. Attacks, molestations, gang rapes, kidnappings, extortion, you name it..they've dealt with it...and that's not even counting the last 20 years. With more than 5000 years of of peaceful and a culturally rich history behind them, this community is still fighting its battle with extinction. But that's no genocide right? Of course, it's not, I know it, I'm very secular. I don't care about the sheer magnitude of this which dwarfs any other thing I can think of, it's still not important. Yes, I know it's not as important, anything which doesn't happen to minorities does not deserve as much attention, not from the Government, not from us. Yes, that's true, I know it, I'm a secular person. I could go on and on and on about how secular our country is(yes, haven't even touched the surface yet), how secular we are...but I'm gonna stop for now, my little secular brain cannot handle any more thoughts.

For those of you who missed the fineprint or chose not to, here's a summary of what I meant to say--
Fascism in the name of Bajrang Dal and VHP is termed as Hindu terrorism, rightly or wrongly..I do not know..but I am sure that whatever these buggers do is shameful and cowardly and they deserve punishment. Anyway, the point...why are we so quick and unrestrained when speaking about one but treading carefully for the other?? Why can't we differentiate 'anti social' from 'anti national'? As much as many of us would love to lump these two terms together, NO, it's not the same thing. It's criminal, yes, it deserves punishment, yes, but it's not the same thing. The fact is that we are STILL not secular as people. Maybe it's our own fears or maybe it's the ghaaslate fed into our brains by our leaders...i don't know. What I do know is that once the Government actually starts viewing people of all religions and faiths as EQUALS, all the bickering will end..atleast the internal ones. It doesn't matter who commits the crimes, be it Christian, Muslim or Hindu...spiritual leaders included. They should be punished!! Playing vote bank politics of appeasement will only hurt in the long run. This is is not aimed at the Government only, it's also something we Indians need to realize. There is nothing wrong is pointing out what is wrong. There is nothing wrong in calling a spade a spade. But if we keep calling Hindu spades spades and Christian and Muslim ones clubs, then you'll have a severe unbalance. We are all witness to how the extremists react. Let's see when the Government actually plans to sponsor Tirth Yatra as they sponsor Haj, hey!.. a Chaar Dhaam terminal right alongside Haj terminals at airports might be a good idea too na?

Also, I want to say sorry to all who get offended by reading this. Trust me, I don't intend to hurt anyone's feelings or demean anybody. It's just that, of late, the media and many many ignorant people in the blogosphere are speaking without any knowledge and awareness of what actually happens in India and what the real problems are and I chose to make a post about it. The siutation is India as of now is this--if you're a Hindu and dfend your faith with mere words, you're branded a fundamentalist and lunatic, but if you loudly attack Hinduism and Hindus for the the crimes they may or may not have commited, you're a great secularist. Why? No more!..I say no to this. Yes, I know that being 80% of the population, the onus for religious and cultural harmony lies with the Hindus. But the rest of our fellow Indians should take a a few steps atleast. I can't tell you how happy I was this time when our dear Muslim friends and brothers took out peace protests and wore black bands. Yes, I'm proud of them that they have acknowledged the reality of Islamic Terrorism and doing what they can. Indian Chrisitans must also speak about the terrorism in the North East, about the societal structure destroying policies of conversion in many parts of India. Muslims, Hindus, Christians should fight against whatever hapens in Noth East, Kashmir, Orissa, Karnataka etc alike. Sadly, these days we see everybody targeting the majority, and sometimes enjoying! it (the reason still beats me). Don't just stand up for yourself, learn to stand for others too. Of course, what I'm saying is not the only problem..many other problems exist too. Neither is my view the only solution, definitely not..it's a viewpoint...just as so many others have in this big bad world.

Lastly, I know that Hindu is not equal to India. Yes, not anymore, I agree..with all my heart. But you must still give a thought about the complexity of Hindu, Hindustan, Bharat or India. You really must, it is imperative that all citizens of his country really understand what these words mean and how it stands truly apart from any nation or civilization in the history of the world. Although it is very VERY! complex and would probably require a disertation in itself, I'll leave you with these thoughts. In all lands of the world, where Muslim conquests or Church crusades were successful, the native indigenous traditions were largely destroyed and supplanted. Why did this not happen in India? It's very complex; is it the resilience of the Hindu way of life? Maybe..I don't know. What I do know is that it allows gracious acceptance of other religions and cultures, it is secure in its motherland that is India (used to be the whole of Indian subcontinent) as well as its culture and religious beliefs. Now don't take this in a wrong way (this is meant for the anti national elements and terrorists only), but once the non-Hindu inhabitants of our country truly understand this and stop trying to consciously overthrow the idea that is India, the ethos that is India, it will be a better place for all of us. Now before any of you smart a**** come out saying who am I to define India, or that Christianity came to India 2000 years ago blah blah. Please, I say sorry, again,...I'm not asking for going back to the ancient ages, I'm just asking you to have a little more perspective on why after so many millennia of tolerance against torture, tyranny, taxation, conversion..we are finally hearing the words Hindu terrorism ( I still don't believe in this term though). Oh and if you're hung up on history of other religions in India, then it's my duty to let you know that Hindus and India go back to as much as 7000 B.C., predating even the birth of Isam and Christianity.

P.S: You can have a look at this and this; two very sensible posts from Umm Oviya and read the comments to gauge the very narrow view and ignorance of people on what happens, and has been happening in India. There are many! more around the blogosphere but I just don't have the inclination to list them here, and most of them, sadly are biased or even bigoted. It's a clever display of juggling between the "humane" aspect and the "fundamentalist" aspect at their convenience. I say more power to them.